<aside> <img src="/icons/brain_purple.svg" alt="/icons/brain_purple.svg" width="40px" />
</aside>
Emotional Intelligence (EI) has been a key focus in leadership research for over 30 years, gaining widespread recognition in the late 1990s. Today, developing emotionally intelligent leaders is more critical than ever, as businesses strive to retain top talent, foster innovation, and drive sustainable growth.
So, how does Emotional Intelligence relate to leadership?
Studies show that leaders consistently score higher in EI than the general population. This is because strong leadership relies on core EI competencies such as self-awareness, empathy, decision-making, and stress management. Rather than focusing on abstract leadership traits, many professionals find it more effective to develop specific, measurable EI skills—which is where the EQ-i 2.0® and EQ 360® assessments become invaluable.
These scientifically validated tools break down Emotional Intelligence into actionable sub-scales, allowing leaders to identify strengths, target areas for growth, and enhance their overall leadership impact. By improving emotional intelligence, leaders can cultivate stronger teams, navigate challenges with resilience, and create a workplace culture that attracts and develops top talent.
<aside> <img src="/icons/square-two-fourths_purple.svg" alt="/icons/square-two-fourths_purple.svg" width="40px" />
</aside>
The EQ-i 2.0 is the world’s most rigorously tested and scientifically validated Emotional Intelligence (EI) assessment, trusted by organisations globally to drive meaningful change. Unlike generic or self-developed EI tests, the EQ-i 2.0 is a true psychometric tool, backed by extensive research and continuous refinement.
This assessment evaluates 15 EI competencies across five key areas: self-perception, self-expression, interpersonal relationships, decision-making, and stress management. What sets it apart is its holistic approach, analysing how these competencies interact and identifying areas of imbalance. It doesn’t simply label high scores as good and low scores as bad—it focuses on balance and how strengths or gaps impact real-world performance.